|
b. 11
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The slur in EF – despite the fact that it corresponds to the natural phrasing – is probably an addition by Fontana. A similar reservation concerns the slur in bar 12. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 11
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In PE – certainly in accordance with the notation of the manuscript base text – there is an indication of the beginning of the repeated section at the end of the main part of the Polonaise (bars 38-51). In [AI] (→JC), a relevant shorthand begins only in bar 13. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |
||||||||
|
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give sempre legato repetead here by Chopin in FEcor (→FE→GE,EE); probably due to the beginning of a new page in FE. Cf. bars 19-21. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In Ap the rhythmic values of the subsequent two-note chords in the lower voice of the R.H. constitute an alternating short-long (semiquaver-crotchet) scheme in these bars. Moreover, the contrast of the resounding's length is underlined with accents here and there. In the main text we give the homogeneous version of FE (→GE,EE), as far as the sound is concerned. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
|
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in analogous bars 3-4, we propose an alternative interpretation of the short category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
in 