![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 424
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE1 is certainly erroneous and it was corrected both in FE (→EE) and in GE2. In the main text we place a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 424-425
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the slur of FE (→GE,EE) is inaccurate, which is proved by the slur in analogous bars 428-429 (most probably proofread by Chopin) as well as by the slurs in the L.H. in both places. The absence of slurs in further part of bar 425 is probably intentional – in analogous bar 429, one can see traces of removal of the slur over the 2nd and 3rd groups of semiquavers in FE. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 426-427
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A shorter slur is an inaccuracy of GE3. Chopin proofread this slur in FE – the traces of corrections show that the original slur would begin on the 3rd beat of bar 426 – and did not change the moment of its ending. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 428-432
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling entered by Chopin into FC (→GE) and added by him in the proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 429
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2), distorting the sequence of bass (implemented by cellos and double basses), must be erroneous. However, the traces of proofreading visible in FE prove that it was the engraver of this edition that committed a mistake, yet in GE1 the note was revised by adding an admittedly overlooked category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |