Issues : Authentic corrections of FE

b. 412

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Staccato dots in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE

..

The missing dots in GE are most probably an oversight, although it cannot be ruled out that the markings were added in the last proofreading of FE – cf. bar 430.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 415-423

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

A (→GE) features a das the penultimate quaver in bar 415. In the proofreading of FE (→EE), Chopin changed the notation of this note to e2. He performed an identical change in the notation of the topmost note of the chord on the penultimate quaver in bar 423. Similarly in bars 455 and 463. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Enharmonic corrections , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 416

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In A (→GE) the crotchet of the bottom voice is written as a g2. Similarly, the bottom note of the 3rd quaver is a g1. While proofreading FE (→EE), Chopin changed the notation of both notes to a2(1), in accordance with the way in which he wrote all subsequent appearances of similar bars. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Enharmonic corrections , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 416

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

g1 in chord in A (→GE)

e1 in chord in FE (→EE)

..

The version of A (→GE) is most probably the original review of this chord, left by inadvertence (haste). It is proved by the undoubtedly Chopinesque proofreading of FE (→EE) and by the corrections visible in A in the repetition of this bar (bar 456).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place

b. 416-423

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No L.H. slurs in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

L.H. slurs in GE3

..

In GE3, slurs in the L.H. were added in this fragment, most probably under the influence of analogous bars 440-444. It could be considered justified, if not for the fact that the range of the slurs was adjusted to the slurs in the R.H. not in an authentic version, but in an arbitrarily changed one – cf. a corresponding note to bars 417-424. Moreover, Chopin probably consciously rejected slurs in the L.H. in the discussed bars. It is proved by the traces of removal of the slur in the L.H. in bar 418 visible in FE; it was probably in [A] ​​​​​​​that the slurs in this section were so fragmentary that the composer preferred removing the inaccurate and misleading slurs rather than correcting them, given that the correct phrasing is indicated by the slurs in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE