b. 677
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing fingering digit in GE could be explained by it having been added by Chopin in the last proofreading of FE. However, the fact of having left a few mistakes, particularly the wrong note at the beginning of the bar, rather suggests that the composer did not address that bar in the last phase of work on the text of FE and that GE simply overlooked the digit. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 678
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to Chopin, this bar is supposed to be a repetition of b. 227. Due to the reasons discussed in the note concerning that bar, in the main text we interpret the mark written there by Chopin as a long accent. A similar solution was adopted also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 678-679
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The discussed bars are an exact repetition of b. 227-228. The slur written there in A over the b-a motif was not repeated in derivative sources, both there and here. See also b. 95-96. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||
b. 679
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add cautionary sharps before the f notes. Accidentals in the R.H. were added already in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 681-682
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give a hairpin, written by Chopin in FC (→GE1) in b. 230 (the discussed bar is a repetition thereof). Just like there, subsequent GE arbitrarily shortened the mark and moved it over the top stave. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |