mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 388

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

in FE

in GE & EE
..

In the main text, we adopt the  hairpin after FE as the most likely reflection of Chopin's notation in [A]. In GE and EE the sign was slightly shifted in order to fit into the limits of semiquaver beams.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 388

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 388

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

FE does not contain any accidentals in the last semiquaver triplet. The patent inaccuracy was rectified in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 389

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Rhythm in EE & GC (→GE1)

FE and GE2
..

Both rhytmical versions of this bar may well be authentic. Identical rhythmical differences between these sources occur in corresponding bars 47 and 129. In the main text we present the FE version - most probably the latest.                                             In GE2 there is arbitrarily borrowed rhythm from FE.

 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Inserted rest

b. 389-390

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE

GC (→GE) & FE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources