Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 732

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Staccato dot in A (→FEEE)

No mark in FC (→GE)

..

The missing staccato dot in FC (→GE) must be an oversight of the copyist.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 734

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

In the main text we add cautionary flats before B and b.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 736

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

In A one can see that both in this and in analogous b. 744 Chopin deleted the  indications in A.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 748-749

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

In A one can see that Chopin initially wrote sempre piu stretto as an agogic indication for this eight-bar section (over the top stave). According to us, cresc. between the staves was written at the same time, which is indicated by the fact that both indications begin at the same moment of the bar. Chopin then decided to merge both indications by deleting sempre piu stretto above and adding stretto e before cresc.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 755-756

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Continuous slur in A (literal reading→FCGE, →FEEE)

Overlapping slurs in A, contextual interpretation

Separate slurs, our alternative suggestion

..

In A (→FC) b. 756 opens a new page, while the phrase marks, both in b. 755 and 756, suggest continuation. Therefore, it is no wonder that all editions combined them. On the other hand, the passage beginning in b. 756 is strictly opening (cf. its previous appearances in b. 49 and analog. and 716 and 720), so one can assume inaccuracy of notation, particularly in b. 756. Such phrase marks, written with a flourish, can be frequently encountered in Chopin's autographs, e.g. in b. 589 and 597, where their meaning is, however, unequivocal. Taking into account the above, we suggest two alternative solutions in which the phrase marks are not combined. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Uncertain slur continuation