mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 327-328

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

  under L.H. in FE (→EE)

 under L.H. in GE1 (→GE2)

 between staves in GE3

  between staves, our alternative suggestion
..

The missing  hairpin is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE, although one cannot exclude the possibility that the mark was added in the last proofreading of FE.
Just like in the case of crescendo in bar 323, one can assume that the fact that both   marks were placed under the L.H. part resulted from lack of space in [A], since in this case, the hairpin emphasises the topmost point of the sequence, which would be much more legible if it were placed next to the moving part of the figuration, hence between the top notes of the L.H. and the R.H. part. This is how the  hairpin in bar 328 was interpreted in GE3. We suggest this solution, including both marks, as a variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 327-328

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

​​​​​​​ in FE (→EE)

No marking in GE1 (→GE2)

​​​​​​​ in GE3
..

The missing  in GE suggests that it was added in the last phase of proofreading of FE. In GE3, the absence of the dynamic marking at the beginning of the Tutti was considered a mistake, and ​​​​​​​ was arbitrarily added in bar 327.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 327

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In GE1 (→FE1,EE1→EE2) there are no accidentals to the fifth on the 2nd quaver in the bar, which would result in B-f. The oversight was corrected in GE2 (→GE3,FESB), FE2 and EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 327-329

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Staccato dots in A

Wedges in GE (→FE,EE)
..

As before, all staccato marks used by Chopin, in this case dots, were arbitrarily reproduced in GE as wedges.
In FESB both marks in bar 327 were overlooked; we do not regard this incomplete version as an independent variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 327-328

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

As in previous analogous sequences, Chopin did not see the reason to write accidentals to the topmost notes of the ascending triplets. In GE1 (→FE,EE) only 2 sharps in bar 328 were added, c3 and g3, while in GE2 (→GE3,FESB) a  to e3 was also added. The two necessary sharps in bar 327 were added only in GE3 and FESB.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions