mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 283-284

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No markings in FE (→GE)

 in bar 284 in EE

Pedalling suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we add pedalling markings on the basis of comparison with analogous bars 299-300. In bar 284, the addition was performed already in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 283

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

The fingering, written probably by the hand of the pupil in FEH, was changed in this bar – the a-g transition was initially marked with the 2 and 3 digits. The correction could have been suggested by Chopin, which is indicated by further compliance with the entry in FED. In the main text, we include the indication of the latter, whose authenticity is unquestionable and which specifies the unobvious use of the 1st finger on a black key, crucial for a comfortable grip of the chord in the next bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH

b. 283-284

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Slur to b2 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slur to b3 in GE3
..

The slur of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is almost certainly too long – the engraver must have confused the b3 quaver in bar 283 with the b2 quaver in bar 284, which is placed at the same height. Therefore, we acknowledge the correction introduced in GE3 in the main text. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 283

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Sixth in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Fourth in GE3
..

It is difficult to determine what the motivation of the reviser of GE3 was when he was changing the 2nd quaver of the bar, since it is the 4th quaver that differs from the respective dyads in the analogous bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 283-284

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

When interpreted literally, the right-hand ending of the phrase mark does not go beyond b. 283, yet its shape clearly suggests that it should be led to the last note of the passage. This is how it was understood in the remaining sources, which, being both musically and pianistically natural, we adopt in the main text. The righteousness of this decision is confirmed by the phrase mark of A in analogous b. 385-386, which was extended and clearly led to c4.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A