



b. 283
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
It is uncertain whether the two triplet slurs, added probably at the stage of proofreading of FE (→EE), were supposed to have any other meaning according to the person who was entering them (perhaps Chopin), e.g. motivic or concerning articulation. We do not include them in the main text and thus keep the notation of the corresponding bars (b. 50 and 283) in the first and final sections of the Polonaise coherent, as intended by the composer. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
||||||
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we include the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Chopin's hesitations , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The slight change of range of the slur in GE (→FE,EE) could be considered an inaccuracy. According to us, a routine revision is, however, more likely, adjusting the range of the slur to beams or regular rhythmic structures, e.g. bars. In this case, the slur starts from the beginning of the bar, hence earlier than in A; by contrast, in bars 284-285 – also from the beginning of the bar, but later than in A. In the main text we give the slur of A, starting from the semiquaver, as in the analogous phrases in bars 275, 279 and 287. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A one can see a deletion before the 1st L.H. crotchet, yet it allows us to decipher the removed element, that is a C1-E category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Terzverschreibung error , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Deletions in A |