b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, due to the absence of traces of corrections performed in print, a possible Chopinesque proofreading of FE (→EE) is less likely than a mistake of the engraver in this case. Therefore, in the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic version of A (→GE). However, from the musical point of view, the version with g1 is certainly not inferior to it. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A the slur under the motif in the R.H. ends on a, whereas the corresponding slur in the L.H. – on B. A comparison with the slurs in the next bar allows to consider the first of them to be inaccurate. The slurs in GE can be a result of Chopin's proofreading, since leading the slurs to the end of the motifs is more natural here – cf. the authentic slurs e.g. in bars 4-6. In turn, an earlier beginning of the slurs in FE (→EE), being contrary to the structure of the motifs, cannot come from Chopin and is probably a result of an erroneous interpretation of the slurs of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 345-346
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before d2 in bar 345 and e1(2) in bar 346. category imprint: Editorial revisions |