Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 323

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

No fingering in A (→GE1FE,EE)

Fingering in GE2 (→GE3,FESB)

..

The fingering added in GE2 (→GE3,FESB), natural in this place, most probably, however, does not come from Chopin – see bars 55-56.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 324

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

 in A & GE2

No sign in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The missing  hairpin in GE1 (→FEEE) is most probably a result of the engraver's oversight. The sign was restored in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 324

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In the main text we omit the cautionary  before d2. It may be a remaining element of an earlier orthography of the previous triplet, in which the top notes were written as d2, same as in bar 320.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 324

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary  before the acrotchet. The mark was added also in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 324

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE, contextual interpretation

..

In FEH, the fingering digits for the 5th and 4th last semiquavers – 1-2 – are written twice, with different pencils. Since it was the same digits that were written twice, it seems that the person who was writing them for the second time did not notice the notation or wanted to enhance its legibility. In both cases, one of the writing persons could have been Chopin, hence we include those digits in the main text. The fingering digit given for the 9th semiquaver in EE is most probably erroneous – we are almost certainly talking about the 2nd finger and not third, as the digit '2' should be understood in the English system of marking fingers.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Annotations in FEH