Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 229

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

On the 2nd beat of the bar AImaz features an f-a-d1 chord, while on the 3rd beat – an f-d1 sixth.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Accompaniment changes

b. 229

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

FE (→GE,EE) added an unobvious cautionary  to a in the 2nd crotchet. It suggests that it was Chopin who performed it, since a few other situations prove the composer's subconscious uncertainty as to the validity of a 3rd key signature , e.g. the mistake in b. 231.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 229

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

EE1 (→EE2) overlooked the naturals to the octave on the 3rd crotchet. The mistake was corrected by EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 229

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

  in A (→GE)

No markings in FE (→EE1)

   in EE2

Our variant suggestion

..

Chopin probably added a pedal change in this bar to A after [FC], the basis for FE, had been finished. However, both versions can be considered equal, since in similar situations, when the following passage is based on the same chord, Chopin would use a continuous pedal, as in the FE version (→EE1). The pedal markings of EE2 were added on the basis of GE1, yet the  mark was placed inaccurately.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 229

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

g-d1-f1 in A

g-f1 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

In A the d1 notehead in the 2nd L.H. quaver does not align with g and f1 (vertically) and is not adjacent to this quaver's stem. Perhaps this is why it is absent in GE (→FE,EE,IE). The regular nature of this chordal sequence makes a very strong case for the presence of this note (cf. also bars 71-72).

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A