mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 306-308

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slurs from 2nd quaver in A & GE2

Slurs from 1st quaver in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

Starting the slurs in bars 306 and 308 already from the beginning of the bar is a typical inaccuracy of GE1 (→FE→EE). Slurs compliant with A were restored in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 306-308

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slur in bara 306-308 in A

Slur to bar 309 in GE1 (→FE)

Different slurs in both hands in EE

Slurs to bar 309 in GE2
..

The slur of GE1 reaches beyond the bar line, which most probably resulted from the common carelessness of the engraver; however, as a result of this, in the remaining editions the slur was led to the chord in bar 309.
Same as before in bars 293-304, the slurs in the L.H. are most probably an addition of the revisers of EE and GE2, whereas the slur in EE ends on the last quaver in bar 308 (differently than the slur in the R.H.).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 306-307

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in FE (→EE1→EE2, →GE1→GE2)

Slur in GE3 & EE3

Same slur suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we suggest adding a slur after analogous bars 290-291. The slur was added already in EE3 and GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 306

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

In A the  before the middle note of the L.H. chord is placed clearly too low, which in this case could have been due to the intention of avoiding collision with the bar line. Fontana correctly interpreted the meaning of that mark in FC (→GE); however, in FE the sharp was initially ascribed to the bottom note of the chord, g. That erroneous version got to EE1 and was then corrected through the addition of a proper  both in the last phase of proofreading of FE and in EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Accidental below/above the note

b. 306

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio sign in A

No sign in FC (→GE) & FE (→EE)
..

The missing arpeggio must be an oversight of the copyist and the engraver of FE: the mark in A is inconspicuous, since it is atypically placed between the accidentals, and not notes.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC