b. 305
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Unlike in previous analogous bars, in this case the wavy lines following the marks are also absent in FE, which must be an oversight. In the main text we add wavy lines, as was already done in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 305
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The rhythm of A (→GE→EE,FESB) is almost certainly erroneous, which is evidenced by the long accent, certainly referring to the note held slightly longer (with a dot). Chopin corrected his mistake while proofreading FE1 (→FE2); the correct version is also in AsI. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 305
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the undoubtedly authentic and intentional notation of A, in which it is only the bass notes that are provided with staccato marks. The authenticity of the decision to provide all semiquavers with such marks is uncertain – according to us, it could have resulted from the engraver of GE1 impulsively considering the notation of A to be incomplete. The fact that Chopin wanted the bass notes to be performed differently than the chords is confirmed by the initial version of AsI. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 306
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The cautionary flat before e3 was added – perhaps by Chopin – in the proofreading of GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 306-308
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A the accents in bars 306 and 308 are long, which is very clear particularly in bar 308. In spite of this, in GE1 and subsequent editions they were reproduced as short ones. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |