mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 304-308

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Dots & accents in GE3
..

In this case, the staccato dots and accents added in GE3 in bars 304, 306 and 308 may be considered justified – they are authentic indications present in the R.H. in analogous bars 76, 78 and 80.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 304-306

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary  before b​​​​​​​1 in bars 304 and 306.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 304-309

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Triplet-slurs in FE (→GE,EE)

No extra slurs – our suggestion
..

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Triplet slurs

b. 304-305

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No slur in GE & FE (→EE)

Slur suggested by editors
..

The absence of the slur in the sources was most probably caused by Chopin's oversight in [A]. More details in the note to b. 19-20.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 304

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No markings in sources

Pedalling suggested by the editors
..

Like in b. 45, 71 and 278, in the main text we suggest adding pedal markings after b. 19.

category imprint: Editorial revisions