mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 247

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

There are no accidentals in the last group of semiquavers in the L.H. in A. In GE (→FE→EE) the signs were added after the R.H. An authentic cautionary  before a2, in the editions added also before a1, draws attention. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A

b. 247

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No sign in A

 in GE (→FE→EE)
..

The missing  in A is most probably Chopin's neglect. However, it is not entirely certain whether it was he that added the sign in the proofreading of GE (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 247-248

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

 signs in A

 in GE (→FE→EE)
..

In both bars, we place the final  asterisks in accordance with A, in which they seem to be placed in a well-considered manner. Moving them to the end of the bar in the editions is most probably a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 247-248

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accents in A

Accents in GE1 (→FE)

Vertical accents in EE

Accents in GE2
..

In the main text we preserve the notation of the accents of A. It almost certainly marks – in spite of the use of single signs in five out of six places – accenting of respective notes in both hands. In GE1 (→FE) the signs were moved to such an extent that they clearly refer to the R.H. In EE and GE2 all accents were placed both in the part of the R.H. and the L.H., whereas in EE they were changed to vertical accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 247-248

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur to bar 248 in A

Slurs in bar 247 in GE1 (→FE→EE)

Slurs to bar 248 in GE2
..

Shortening the slur in the editions is certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, in the case of the addition of a slur for the L.H., Chopin's proofreading cannot be entirely excluded. In GE2 both slurs were preserved, extending both in accordance with the notation of the slur in the R.H. in A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions