



b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
It is hard to state whether the simplified notation of the part of the R.H. in FE (→GE,EE) resulted from Chopin's proofreading or the engraver's inaccuracy. The first of these possibilities is indicated by the addition of the lento indication in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
All sources include naturals before d2 in bar 175 and before A in bar 176. Together with the category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurring of GC is certainly incomplete and it was completed already in GE. In the main text we give the slur of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The lento indication is undoubtedly a Chopin addition in the proofreading of FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ |