mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 235-236

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

 
 
..

In GE the slur extending over the phrase breaks at the 235 and 236 barline. The difference most probably arises from the fact that the bar line is at the same time the breaking line of the systems both in A and other sources, except GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 235

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

No e1 in chord in FE0 (→FE,EE,FEG→GE1)

e1 in chord in GE2 (→GE3)
..

GE2 (→GE3) added an arbitrary e1 to the chord on the 3rd crotchet. On the other hand, it cannot be entirely excluded that lack of this note is an oversight of the engraver of FE0, unnoticed by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 235

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

No slur in FEG (→GE1)

Slur in FE1, EE & GE2 (→GE3)
..

To the main text we adopt the ending of the slur of FE1, EE and GE2 (→GE3), which according to Chopin's intention was to replace the previous incomplete slurring.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 235

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

Slur in FE & FEG (→GE1)

Slur in EE

No slur in GE2 (→GE3)
..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 235

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED
 
..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED