|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A there are no augmentation dots on the c1-e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In IE, most probably as a result of a mistake, we find the F1-F octave on the first beat of the LH part. Similarly, in GE1 we find the Ces-ces octave in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In EE on the first and second beat of b. 160 and on the first beat of b. 161 there are category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 161-164
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
FE1 overlooked L.H. slurs in this bar and the two following ones. Chopin supplemented slurring with one slur encompassing bars 161-164 while proofreading FE2 (→FE3). That slur runs from the beginning of bar 161, contrary to A and similar bars 157 and 159. Hence, the engraver might have misplaced the beginning of slur inscribed by Chopin. The later beginning of slur may be regarded as an equivalent variant. The EE version results most likely from an inaccurate reading of A, despite its conformity to FE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
1 third at the beginning of b. 153 (and also 161, marked as repeat). The corresponding b. 149 (157) is illegible due to the charred manuscript, and threre are no reasons to differentiate them, in which case all augmentation dots in 
before f1 in RH. In 
markings without accents. In all impressions of 
marking on the first beat of b. 161. In 
