data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1
compare
The absence of the mark in GE is certainly an oversight, perhaps partially influenced by the FE layout, where the wedge was placed very close to the octave sign. A similar situation occurred in bar 156.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins