Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 144-147

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In AsI these bars are marked as a repetition of b. 136-139 (similarly, b. 148-149 are a repetition of b. 140-141). Admittedly, repeat signs are neither at the beginning of b. 136 nor at the end of b. 143; however, the intended repetition is proven by the fact that b. 142-143 were written directly before b. 150-151. At the same time, the first pair of bars was encompassed with a 1. volta bracket, while the second pair with a 2. volta bracket.
For convenience sake, that is to be able to compare AsI with the other sources, in the content transcription we adjust the notation of AsI to the remaining sources by writing out repeated b. 136-141 as b. 144-149. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

b. 144-147

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In AsI the alternative L.H. part is not written out in these bars – see b. 135-139.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 144-146

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

..

In the 2nd half of bar 144 and 146 there are no accidentals in A. Chopin was generally convinced that notes written at the same pitch do not require repeating accidentals regardless of the presence of an octave sign. The then contemporary rules were not fully established yet, which is proven by the fact that the notation was left unchanged in FE1. Eventually, however, both FE2 (→EE) and GE added all accidentals. Similarly, in further such passages.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE

b. 144

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

..

In A and FE there is no  to the dotted crotchet in the middle of the bar (f2). Chopin's patent oversight was corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE

b. 144-146

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

4 long accents in A (→GE)

2 long accents in FE

Long accent in b. 144 in EE1

3 short & 1 long accents in EE2

2 short & 2 long accents suggested by the editors

..

The long accents entered into A (→GE) at the beginning of bar 144 and 146 are probably inaccurate, which is indicated by a comparison with respective marks in analogous bar 148 and 150 as well as 224-230 and 311-315. Due to the above, in the main text we suggest short accents here. The absence of these marks in FE almost certainly means that Chopin added them to A after [FC] had been finished. In EE1 out of two FE accents only the first one was reproduced, whereas in EE2 the three remaining ones were added – as short ones – after comparing it with GE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE