b. 185
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We do not include the staccato dot in the main text, featured in AF (→FE→EE), since the principal source (GE) contains two other indications instead, i.e. and an accent – see the adjacent note. However, it does not have to mean that Chopin in fact considered these indications separately, since we cannot rule out an oversight in [AG] or GE. Due to this reason, according to us, the dot can be regarded as complementing the indications of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||
b. 185
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The lack of a hairpin in FC (→GE) is most probably a copyist's oversight. Likewise in the analogous b. 636. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
|||
b. 185
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The asterisk having been removed at the end of the bar in A and added under b, as in b. 180-181, is a reason for the suggested alternative version of pedalling. As Chopin considered a whole-bar pedal unsuitable for b. 184, there is no visible reason to apply it in b. 185, which is almost identical. Actually, there is a number of situations in which Chopin omits an intended correction in one of a few places, cf., e.g. the Etude in E, Op. 10 No. 3, b. 33, Prelude in B, Op. 28 No. 21, b. 36 or the Concerto in E minor, Op. 11, I mov., b. 50-51. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 186-188
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In GE there are no slurs connecting quavers and crotchets in the RH part on the first and second beat of b. 187 and the first beat of b. 188. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||
b. 186
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The version in GC (→GE1→GE2) is undoubtedly mistaken – cf. the previous bar. The error was corrected only in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |