Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 180-188

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

No L.H. slurs in AI & AF (→FEEE)

L.H. slurs in GE

..

The L.H. slurs in b. 180-182 and 185-188 must be a Chopinesque improvement from [AG] (→GE). Cf. b. 173-176.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

b. 180

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

GE3 (→GE4) added a digit 3 over the first quaver, as if it constituted a part of the triplet with the next one, as in all subsequent, similar motifs. However, a respective rest is missing; moreover, the notes were not moved with respect to the L.H. part, which points to an unfinished change (intended and arbitrary) or to a mistake of the reviser (which seems more likely).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 180

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

Additional slur in A

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

..

As in the preceding bar, in the main text we do not include the additional slur under the quaver triplet, entered into A and omitted by FE (→GE,EE). Cf. General Editorial Principlesp. 16.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Triplet slurs

b. 180

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

No slur in A (→GEFE,EE1EE2)

Slur in EE3

Slur suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we propose adding a slur covering a pair of double stops at the transition of bars 180-181, b-a1 and e1-g1. The slur was also added in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 180

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

in A (→GE1GE2)

 in FE & EE

 in FESB

in GE3

..

According to the editors, the  sign in A (→GE1GE2) is entered imprecisely because it includes a rest during which a crescendo cannot be started. In the main text, we give it a scope analogous to the next such sign. A similar interpretation is used in FE and EE, as well as in FESB, in which, however, the sign is reversed (diminuendo instead of crescendo). It's hard to say whether this was an intentional change or a mistake. On the contrary, in GE3 the sign was slightly extended, which was probably a revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Sign reversal , FE revisions , Revisions in FESB ,