|
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
The version of EE is almost certainly a mistake: oversight of the quaver flag. In GE1a flags were overlooked next to the last two notes of the bar, which is a side effect of the graphical retouches in this fragment of the page. The mistake was not repeated in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In GE there are no dots extending the c1-f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In terms of music, the accent added in EE is very justified: cf. analogous b. 96. However, it is absent in FE (→GE), and we keep this sparing notation in the main text believing that Chopin could have imagined this short recall of the Semplice section at the end of the piece with subdued, more delicate accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the unequivocal long accent, written in AF. The short accents in the editions must be a result of misunderstanding the manuscripts. In FE (→EE) the mark was placed under the wrong chord by mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE |
1 minim. It must be a mistake of the engraver of 
before b
. 
