|
b. 142-145
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The essential difference between the fingering of FEH and EE consists in the performance manner of the descending third in each group of semiquavers – in FEH, the fingers 2-3 were used, in EE – 2-4. It is difficult to say if and which of them corresponds to the fingering conceived by Chopin, since the authenticity of the fingering in these sources has not been confirmed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, the accent was arbitrarily changed to a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Accents are present in 11 similar figures of this and previous, analogous phrases, so that the missing mark in the indicated place must be considered an inaccuracy. In the main text, we add a long accent in accordance with the accents used in FE. The short accent added in GE3 and EE3 corresponds to the accents adopted in those editions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FEH, there is an added cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |
||||||||
|
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
FE has erroneously c as the last L.H. note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
before d
1 on the 2nd quaver in the L.H. It is difficult to determine what the motivation of the person adding that accidental was, since nothing suggests here a possibility of a mode change, whereas the last alteration of d