b. 135
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
GE4 added a cautionary next to f2 in the R.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 135-136
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 overlooked the initial, falling on bar 135, fragment of the hairpin. The mistake was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 135
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Assigning the b1 crotchet to the top voice, which made a quaver of it, is, according to us, a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 who either did not understand the notation of A or made his work easier. Adding an extending dot next to the note in FE (→EE) may be an ad hoc correction of an alleged oversight of the dot in the version of GE1. Therefore, in the main text we preserve the version of A as the only undoubtedly authentic. Theoretically, both in the case of the change in GE1 and FE, one cannot entirely exclude a possibility of Chopin's proofreading, yet it seems to be highly unlikely that he would like to change such a minor detail of accompaniment – the difference in the sound with a natural harmonic pedalling is practically imperceptible. GE2 returned the version of A. Similarly in an analogous place in the recapitulation, bar 283. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 135
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 135-136
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The range and placement of the slur in A are unclear. According to us, it may refer to the quavers in the top voice, as it was interpreted in the editions (except for EE1, in which the slur was overlooked) but also to the crotchet of the bottom voice, leading to the b minim in the next bar. Analysing also the notation of an analogous fragment of the recapitulation (bars 283-284) as well as a few other aspects of notation and structure of music, we decided to adopt the second possibility to the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |