Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 414
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The inaccurately reproduced staccato mark in GE1 (→GE2), dot instead of wedge, was restored in GE3, probably after the base text or an analogy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 415-416
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Three clearly long accents written in A were reproduced in GE1, without any apparent reason, in an explicitly varied manner. However, FE restored the notation of A, which could be seen as Chopin's proofreading. Both in EE and GE2 the Chopinesque long accents were reproduced as common short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 416-419
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The dashes marking the range of crescendo were omitted in GE, as in many other places in the Rondo. In EE, the indication – within the marked range – was divided into syllables what is a revision, typical of the English publisher. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
|
b. 420-421
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A bar 420 is the last one on the page, whereas the slur written with a flourish clearly indicates continuation in the next bar. However, there is no ending of this slur in bar 421, which could have reassured the engraver of GE1 of his whole-bar approach (moreover, the traces of corrections visible in bars 420 and 421 suggest that each of these bars was initially encompassed with one slur; the erroneous division of the slur at the beginning of bar 421 was then corrected – perhaps by Chopin – to the version compliant with A). In GE2, Chopin's intention contained in A was reproduced correctly. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |
||||||||||
|
b. 426
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in GE1 (→GE2) must be an inaccuracy of the engraver who could have misinterpreted the "encompassing" slur of FE. A slur compliant with both piano and musical logic was restored in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
& > in 
