mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 6-7

composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor

Slur to a in sources

Slur to g suggested by the editors
..

In the sources the slur reaches only the last semiquaver in b. 6. A comparison with analogous situations in b. 2-3, 10-11 and 14-15 proves that it is almost certainly a result of inaccuracy of A.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 6

composition: Op. 28 No. 11, Prelude in B major

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

In the main text we include the fingering entered probably by Chopin into FED.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 6

composition: Op. 28 No. 11, Prelude in B major

..

FE overlooked the  restoring e1 on the 5th R.H. quaver. The accidental was added in EE; it was also entered into FEJ, probably by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEJ

b. 6-7

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

..

GE overlooked the crotchet stems prolonging the A notes.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 6-7

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

Slur in A (→FC→GE)

No slur in FE (→EE)
..

The absence of a slur is certainly an error by the engraver of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE