|
b. 5-15
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In bars 5 and 15, opening new lines, the endings of some slurs/ties from the previous bars were omitted in FE – of the slur in bar 5 and of the slur and of the tie to a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The crescendo hairpins are marked slightly different in each of the sources. The right-hand end of the hairpins in A is unclear. Comparison with analogous bars and FE and EE versions (out of which one is most probably based on a different autograph), enables considering A's notation as inaccurate. We harmonise the notation according to analogous places. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
The accent in EE is certainly an arbitrary addition by the publisher, introduced by analogy with an authentic accent in similar bar 89. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In the sources, bar 7 begins a new line of text; in such situations it is difficult to decide in Chopin's autographs whether the slur is to be treated as a new sign or a continuation of the previous one. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
1 in bar 15. The inaccuracies did not mislead the engraver/reviser of 
