|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
A (→FE→GE1,EE) includes an erroneous A2-C category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Errors of A |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Lack of the sign in EE may indicate distraction of the engraver, copyist (if it was a copy of A that was the base text to EE) or of Chopin himself, if it was another autograph that constituted the base text or if the dynamic signs were added by Chopin already after the copy had been prepared. Moreover, in EE there are no dynamic signs in bars 4-7. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
In EE1 the lowest note of the last beat in the R.H. is the erroneous a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||
|
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
Cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 17. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
There is no pedalling in the previous sources. While preparing the Etude for print, Chopin most probably would add indications in three Stichvorlage manuscripts, which is directly proven by GC (the signs are written with Chopin's hand), and indirectly also by CDP, probably reflecting the state of [A] before the last retouch and additions. Hence, the earlier pedal release in FE cannot be considered a mistake, as analogous bars 24 and 55 are marked in the same way. In the main text, we give the possibly later notation of GC (→GE) and EE – cf. bar 24. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
tenth. It is a patent error of Chopin in the number of the ledger lines. The pitch of the note was corrected in 
in 
1.
