|
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
FE overlooked the general part of the octave sign over the initial, highest fragment of figuration (in the majority of the sources, including FE, it embraces also half of bar 6). The only visible trace of the indication is the word loco, which was used to end the octave sign in the times of Chopin. This patent error was corrected in FED and FEJ. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEJ |
|
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In EE there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
EE1 has an erroneous d3 as the 4th semiquaver of the 2nd half of the bar. The mistake was corrected in the subsequent EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In EE1 there is no pedal release sign. The oversight – probably of the copyist performing the base text, as the sign is also absent in bar 69 – was corrected in EE2 (→EE3). Cf. one of the previous notes in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The Allegro con brio indication in GC is written with Chopin's hand. It can also be seen that Chopin deleted Allegro molto con fuoco written by the copyist. In this case the composer ensured that the final version is in all sources. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
returning d4 at the beginning of the 2nd group of semiquavers. This rather obvious error remained unnoticed by the revisers of