b. 2-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI, the staccato articulation of the quavers, separated with rests, accompanying the semiquaver figuration (in bars 1-3, 5-6, 9-11), is marked only in bars 1 and 5. There is no doubt that the dots written there are to be understood as a model, hence valid also in the remaining bars. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES |
|||||||||
b. 2-4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The pair of hairpins must have been added by Chopin in FC and base text to EE. Nothing indicates that Chopin could have wanted to resign from these indications – their absence in A (→FE) is almost certainly a result of haste and insufficient attention at the time of parallelly introducing corrections and additions in three Stichvorlage manuscripts. Similarly in bars 6-8. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In FC the part of the R.H. is written in these bars in an abbreviated manner – with the help of •/• signs – as repetition of bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||||||
b. 2-6
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
We add cautionary flats before the 2nd sixth in bars 2 and 6. category imprint: Editorial revisions |