data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in FESB |
|||||
b. 46-47
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes |
|||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In all editions, bar 47 is the final one in the line; moreover, the slur that reaches b. 48 was overlooked in it – it is only the ending of that slur that was printed in b. 48 (in FE this fragment was overlooked too). The diligence with which three different editions – EE, FESB and GE3 – reproduced this clearly erroneous notation is truly puzzling. In our transcriptions, due to a different layout, we treat the versions of all editions as not including a slur. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in GE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the L.H. part Chopin wrote accidentals in A only to the top notes of the octaves – e in b. 47, e1, b, f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Dotted or even rhythm |