b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in b. 35-36 and 39-40, in the manuscripts Chopin overlooked some of the necessary accidentals, in this case only flats. AsI lacks a to the 14th semiquaver in b. 43 (g2) and to the 10th semiquaver in b. 44 (g), and A lacks a to the 14th semiquaver in b. 43 (g2) and flats to the 8th and 20th semiquavers in b. 44 (g1 and g). All omitted accidentals were already added in GE1, which was repeated in the remaining editions. In the main text, we omit the unnecessary repetition. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The fingering added in GE2 (→GE3,FESB), as natural as possible here, could have come from Chopin; however, due to the reasons discussed in the characterisation of GE2, we do not provide it in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
At the end of b. 44, both slurs in A, in the R.H. and the L.H., are provided with clearly marked endings – the R.H. slur ends on the last note in the bar, d1 (one can see an erased ending of the slur, reaching further), while the L.H. slur reaches the quaver at the beginning of b. 45 (one can see an added ending of the slur going beyond the bar line). Nevertheless, in GE (→FE,EE) the L.H. slur was led only to the end of b. 44, probably due to graphical difficulties (caused by the fact that the stems of one of the L.H. triplets were pointing upwards, which was a routine intervention yet contrary to A) – one can see that it was not feasible to lead the slur further without compromising the shape of the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The notation of FE, with a demisemiquaver going beyond the 3rd note of the semiquaver triplet, is contrary to the Chopinesque understanding of such a combination of a dotted rhythm with a triplet – see the note on b. 45-46. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
|||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The lack of a sign is almost certainly an oversight by the FESB engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FESB |