



Slurs
b. 342
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
According to us, the slur in A (→GE→FE,EE) is an element of an earlier version of this place left by inattention or simply a mistake. This is supported by the following arguments:
Due to these reasons, in the main text we omit this slur. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||||||
b. 345-347
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bar 342, the missing R.H. slurs in bars 345-346 are most probably Chopin's oversight, hence it would be appropriate to add slurs. We suggest three versions analogous to the complete versions of bars 341-343 and a fourth one modelled on the continuous slur in bars 359-361, yet maintaining separate the slur entered by Chopin into A at the beginning of bar 347. To the main text we choose the version analogous to the one proofread by Chopin in bars 341-343. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors of A |
|||||||||
b. 354
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest adding top voice slurs. In general, the notation of slurs in this orchestral insert is inaccurate in A and most probably was not reproduced correctly in the editions – see further notes in this bar. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 354
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The slur under the last three quavers of the R.H. bottom voice added in GE (→FE,EE) is questionable, as far as its possible authenticity is concerned. The slurring of this bar could actually be considered incomplete; however, a slur of such range does not correspond to any tangible structural unit (motif), while legato articulation is indicated in the sources of the orchestral part for the entire 6-note motif of the bassoon I from the 2nd quaver in the bar to the beginning of bar 355. According to us, the slur could have resulted from a misunderstanding in interpreting A or an entry in the proof copy of GE1 (perhaps Chopinesque). Taking into account the above, we do not include this slur in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 363-364
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The slurs were being corrected in A, which is evidenced by the traces of erasures in the R.H. part and by the shape of the first L.H. slur. In the R.H. in bar 363 the first slur encompassed 2 triplets, while the second one started from g category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |