![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 34-38
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In GE the notation of the rhythm in bars 34 and 38 was clarified by adding rests under the e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 38-39
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
There are several possible interpretations of the inaccurately drawn slur of FE, encompassing the first two L.H. top voice crotchets. Two of them can be seen in GE and EEW; we give a third one as an alternative suggestion. We assume that the most likely interpretation of this slur is the version adopted by GE, that is with a slur encompassing entire bar 39. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In EEW the bottom notes of the L.H. chords (a) were separated from the remaining ones, written down on the top stave, which thus seem to belong to the R.H. part. Perhaps it contributed to the omission of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In FE there is no category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |