b. 49
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In GE1 (→GE2) the restoring d2 at the end of the bar was overlooked. The mistake was corrected in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In EEW the bottom notes of the L.H. chords (a) were separated from the remaining ones, written down on the top stave, which thus seem to belong to the R.H. part. Perhaps it contributed to the omission of the to g1 at the beginning of the bar – looking only at the alleged R.H. part on the top stave, one could assume that g1 would be more natural for the harmonic course. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary to f2, as it was performed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The missing c1 notes in GE is probably an oversight by the engraver of FE, repeated after the proof copy of FE1, in the finished FE1 corrected by Chopin in the last stage of proofreading. Such a mistake is much more likely when reading a Chopinesque autograph than a printed version – cf., e.g. the Etude in G, Op. 10 No. 5, bar 15, the Etude in E, Op. 10 No. 11, bar 43 or the Concerto in F minor, Op. 21, II mov., bar 41. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 3, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |