data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The lack of a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark |
|||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
In As one can see that before the 2nd quaver of the lower R.H. voice a category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The omission of the note f is a characteristic, subtle example of Chopin's sound economy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes |
|||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The version of FE1 – the 2nd and 3rd crotchets without g – could have been temporarily considered by Chopin. According to us, however, it is more likely that we are dealing with an oversight, which was then corrected in FE2. Both notes were added in GE3, probably on the basis of a comparison with FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE |