|
b. 29-56
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
As is a typical sketch, practically devoid of performance instructions – the only exception is the slur connecting the grace note with the 1st crotchet of bar 41 and perhaps a staccato dot above this crotchet. We do not treat the lack of markings as variants, as they are only a feature of the sketchy nature of this manuscript. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information |
|||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
As in bar 21, in As the melodic voice is moved one second higher compared to the final version. The remaining voices are not written out, which hints – also as in bar 21 – at repeating the version of bar 17. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes |
|||||
|
b. 30-31
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The tie to c1 was added in GE3 probably by analogy with bars 22-23. The Chopinesque fingering in FES confirms that c1 should be played in bar 31. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
In the published version, Chopin decided to notate the rhythm with a semiquaver rest instead of extending the first quaver of the bar. The two-bar slur indicates that the natural flow and emphasis of the phrase should remain intact. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
|
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 2, Mazurka in F minor
..
The absence of mordent in As could be considered an inaccuracy related to the sketchy nature of this manuscript, but for the fact that in bar 22 category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Chopin's hesitations |
1-f1 in 
in