b. 110-112
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, the raising b to b in b. 110 and 112 is missing. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text, we omit the additional slur encompassing the triplet, present in all sources – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. In the next bar, a respective slur is missing. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Triplet slurs |
|||||
b. 112
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
FE (→GE) overlooked the to the top note of the 1st R.H. chord (c3). The mistake was corrected in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||
b. 112
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The change to the rhythmic value of a1, from crotchet to minim, could have been introduced by the reviser to fill the 1st half of the bar in the bottom-most voice. Due to the same reason, he should have also prolonged the c2-f2 minims in the middle voice, hence the lack of such a change supports the Chopinesque origin of the a1 note having been prolonged. See also the note above. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 112-113
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The evolution of the slurring in these bars, visible in the deletions and corrections of A, could have looked like as follows:
The slur received its final shape at the stage of proofreading FE – Chopin prolonged it to the beginning of b. 115. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |