![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Placement of markings
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Placement of markings , Annotations in FES |
||||||||||
b. 87-97
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
It is unclear what caused the difference in the placement of the accents between GE and FE (→EE). One could assume that each version might be non-compliant with Chopin's notation:
At the same time, it means that each version of notation may be authentic; if FE were based on a second autograph, then even both. In the main text we give the notation of our principal source, i.e. FE, which is also supported by:
In the main text we place the accents above the top stave, as it was performed in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings |
||||||||||
b. 98-100
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In accordance with the explanation in the note in b. 87, to the main text we adopt the notation of FE (→EE) with accents over the a-a1 octaves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings |
||||||||||
b. 119-121
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest accents as written down in EE. This solution combines the most certain elements of the versions of GE1 and FE:
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings |