Issues : FE revisions
|
b. 103-104
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE1 there are no sharps raising d1 to d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 186-188
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the entire middle section, each time this theme appears, the grace notes go with the R.H. melody (cf. b. 129, 148-149, 206-208), hence we follow here GE, considering the version of FE2 (→EE) to be a an inept revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 210
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE1 the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 274
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
According to us, the version with d resulted from Chopin having overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
It is uncertain whether the two triplet slurs, added probably at the stage of proofreading of FE (→EE), were supposed to have any other meaning according to the person who was entering them (perhaps Chopin), e.g. motivic or concerning articulation. We do not include them in the main text and thus keep the notation of the corresponding bars (b. 50 and 283) in the first and final sections of the Polonaise coherent, as intended by the composer. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
1 in the L.H. part. The oversight (patent in this context) was corrected in 
to the bottom note of the 2nd quaver is missing. The patent oversight was corrected both in 
