Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 69-70

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Slur to minim in GE

Slur to end of bar 69 in FE (literal reading→EE)

Slur to end of bar 70, possible contextual interpretation

..

In b. 69, which ends the line, the slur of FE clearly suggests that it should be continued; however, b. 70 does not include its ending. In b. 302-303, which are a literal repetition of the discussed bars, there is no slur at all; this mistake impedes a direct reproduction of the ending of the discussed slur. In this situation, we assume that the slur was supposed to reach the end of b. 70, like in analogous b. 44 and 277, and this is the version we suggest in the main text. In GE the slur reaches – like in the aforementioned bars – the c1 minim only, which may but does not have to correspond to the notation of [A].
See also b. 302-303

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 71-72

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No slur in GE & FE (→EE)

Slur suggested by editors

..

The absence of a slur must have resulted from Chopin's oversight in [A], hence in the main text we suggest adding a slur after analogous b. 45-46 and 278-279. A similar situation is in b. 304-305.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 79-84

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Shorter slur in GE

Longer slur in FE

No slur in EE

..

In the main text we give the unequivocal slur of FE. In GE the inaccurate, slightly too long ending of the slur in b. 82 is not a reliable indication of its intended range – it cannot be ruled out that it was also this slur that was supposed to reach b. 83, yet its ending in a new line was overlooked. The missing slur in EE is most probably an oversight of the engraver (one of a few in b. 79-84).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 83-97

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Shorter slurs in GE

Longer slurs in FE (→EE)

..

In b. 83-102 and 111-124 to the main text we adopt the slurring of the principal source, i.e. FE (→EE). Without access to the manuscripts that served as the basis for FE and GE, it seems impossible to evaluate the authenticity and chronology of both versions. Both are possible from the point of view of notation practices of such figures.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 83

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No slur in GE & EE

Slur in FE

..

In the main text we include the ending of the slur of FE reaching this bar – see b. 79-82.

category imprint: Differences between sources