Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
FE overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||
|
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Two rhythmic errors crept into FE1 here: at the beginning of the bar a dotted quaver and a semiquaver instead of a dotted semiquaver and demisemiquaver (in both parts) and a quaver triplet instead of a semiquaver triplet in the L.H. The latter was corrected in FE2 and EE1, while EE2 (→EE3) corrected both mistakes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
|
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The crotchets visible in the L.H. part at the beginning of b. 61 and 62 in FE1 resulted from the engraver having overlooked a quaver flag or beam. In FE2 and EE1 it was only b. 62 that was corrected, hence in that group of editions it is only EE2 (→EE3) that includes the correct text, compliant with GE1 and analogous b. 294-295. The quaver flag in b. 61 was overlooked in GE2 too. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Due to the lowermost ledger line having been overlooked, the bottom note of the L.H. crotchet looks like G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The version of FE (→EE1) almost certainly results from an oversight of the copyist or of the engraver of FE. The mistake was corrected in EE2, probably on the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 46, 279 and 305. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
raising E to E
. The mistake was discovered and corrected in 
