data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1 lacks both the raising e1 to e
1 at the beginning of the bar, and the
restoring e1 two quavers later. In EE1 only a
before the 1st quaver was added, while in FE2 was also added only a
, but before the 3rd quaver! Therefore, it was either misplaced or supposed to be a
. The text of GE and EE2 (→EE3) is correct.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Omissions to cancel alteration, Omission of current key accidentals, FE revisions, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch