![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in FES
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the main text we include the fingering entered most probably by Chopin into FES. It is noteworthy that it differs from the one indicated in FED in an analogous passage in b. 17. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES |
|||||
b. 36-37
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the main text we include the fingering written down by the pupil and coming most probably from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering entered into FES, which most probably comes from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In FE the 2nd semiquaver in both figures is an erroneous c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES |
|||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The pencilled addition in FES, big but vague, could be a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |