Issues : Errors in FE

b. 6-7

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

Slur in A (→FCGE)

No slur in FE (→EE)

..

The absence of a slur is certainly an error by the engraver of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 14

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

Accent in A (→FCGE) & EE2

No mark in FE (→EE1)

..

The missing accent in FE (→EE1) is most probably an oversight of the engraver. The mark was added in EE2, probably on the basis of a comparison with GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 16

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

..

FE (→EE1) omitted the dot prolonging the crotchet b1. The error was corrected in EE2, the remaining sources also have the correct text.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 42

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

..

In FE the 2nd semiquaver in both figures is an erroneous c note, whereas in EE – most probably as a result of revision of this clearly false version – e. The version of EE, although possible in terms of harmony, is pianistically improbable. In turn, the pencilled correction of c to A written in FES, compliant with the version of A (→FCGE), may come from Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES

b. 59

composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor

Wedge & staccato dot in A (→FC)

Wedge in FE

Staccato dot in GE

No marks in EE

..

The omitted staccato markings in the editions must be oversights.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE