|
b. 64-65
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The missing accents in FC (→GE) are an oversight of the copyist. In FE (→EE) they were interpreted as short accents (like the vast majority of such marks). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering entered into FED, most probably Chopinesque. An identical fingering was added in EE; in addition, it was marked more accurately. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
||||||||
|
b. 66-70
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In A (→FE,FC→GE), both in b. 66 and 70, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The missing pedalling markings in this bar are an oversight of the copyist. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
in 
before the 14th note of the roulade (b1). Taking into account the fact that the note was initially preceded by a b2 note written at the same pitch (under an octave sign), we do not consider it a mistake. In the main text we add the accidental; it is also in 
in 