



b. 59
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The omitted staccato markings in the editions must be oversights. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 59-65
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The missing curved lines in FC (→GE) is a serious mistake of Fontana, who also overlooked in these bars the dashes marking the range of stretto and the accents in b. 64-65. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 59-61
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In A certain verbal indications seem to be inaccurately written here: dashes marking the range of cresc. not reaching the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The denser notation of A suggests that the demisemiquaver rest and the beam changing the semiquaver to a demisemiquaver were added by Chopin later. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
||||||||||||||
b. 61-63
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
Chopin carefully marked the range of the stretto indication with dashes – at the beginning of b. 64, one can see another dash in A, crossed-out so that the last three accented octaves were not "squished together" anymore. By an unfortunate trick of chance, the dashes were overlooked both by Fontana in FC (→GE) and the engraver of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |