|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The 4th semiquaver in the 2nd half of the bar in GE is an erroneous F note instead of D, which is in the remaining sources (in the manuscripts the 2nd figure is marked in an abridged manner as repetition of the first). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The long accent was not reproduced in any of the editions, perhaps due to its vague placement between the first two chords in the 2nd half of the bar. According to us, in this context, the mark must be an accent and cannot concern the 2nd chord. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The last time these accompaniment figures appear, Chopin forgot to write a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In GE the arpeggio marks encompass wrong notes – the bottom wavy line runs from A to a, whereas the top one encompasses the f1-a1 third only. This clearly erroneous notation was not corrected by any reviser of the impressions of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
It is uncertain which staccato mark Chopin meant here; it could have influenced both Fontana and the engraver of FE to overlook it. The mark is in the form of a wedge, but it may have resulted from the hand having been moved too quickly after the dot had been written down, which is indicated by the tilt of the bottom part of the mark. In the main text we suggest the literal interpretation, i.e. wedge. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Wedges , Errors of FC |
raising g to g
. The mistake was noticed only in 
