Issues : Omissions to cancel alteration
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
In A (→FE,FC→GE) there is no restoring g1 on the 3rd crotchet in the bottom R.H. voice. The mistake was noticed only in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
This bar was entirely crossed out in A and rewritten on adjacent staves – the R.H. above the crossing-out, while the L.H. – below. In the readable initial version, the regular steps of the R.H. quavers and the position of the 1st L.H. chord are preserved, while the f1 notes are written enharmonically as e1: . The corrections had been performed before the performance marks were introduced – the crossed-out version did not contain the following elements: accent, staccato dots, phrase mark, dashes marking the range of crescendo and pedalling marks. The restoring b1 on the 3rd beat of the bar was also missing. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes , Enharmonic corrections , Main-line changes |
||||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
There are no accidentals before the last octave in A (→FC,FE), which results in d1-d2, which is a patent mistake. There are two possibilities:
According to us, it is the latter that is much more likely, as it is suggested by the harmonic analogy in b. 29-30 and 31-32. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |